• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Narrating heritage\u27s living stories : a comparative study of China\u27s Suojia ecomuseum and Australia\u27s Melbourne living museum of the West
【2h】

Narrating heritage\u27s living stories : a comparative study of China\u27s Suojia ecomuseum and Australia\u27s Melbourne living museum of the West

机译：叙述遗产的生活故事：中国索佳博物馆与澳大利亚的西方西方墨尔本生活博物馆的比较研究

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Ecomusée, as emerged in France in the 1970s, is a form of open-air museum that aims to maintain collections in their original environments with local communities serving as curators and managing their own heritage. This approach and philosophy implies and is dependent upon democratic principles in the conservation and interpretation processes. Since the 1990s, China has adopted the ecomusée concept for the conservation of selected ethnic villages to relieve tensions between poverty and heritage conservation. However, does this concept really work in China? To answer this question, the Suojia Ecomuseum, the first such initiative - has been selected as a case study and assessed using the mixed methodologies of on-site observation, documentation and semistructured interviews. This process has identified several issues and problems associated with this ecomuseum. It demonstrates that Suojia Ecomuseum has not achieved international benchmarks, neither philosophical nor practical expectations have been met. This conclusion challenges the internationally acknowledged notion that all ecomuseums develop and are operated using a bottom-up approach, that they were all community-based and democratic. These discrepancies lead to other questions about the differences between ecomuseums in China and elsewhere. In order to map and compare the differences between ecomuseums in China and in Western democracies, a detailed survey was undertaken using Melbourne’s Living Museum of the West, Australia. Applying the same methodologies as in China, a comparable examination was undertaken as to its background, objectives, management structures, programs and activities, and project outcomes as well as problems. The differences between Suojia Ecomuseum and Melbourne’s Living Museum are then explained and shown. They demonstrate quite diverse organisations with different objectives and management structures relating to different cultural and natural resources. However, the unexpected finding was that the futures of both ecomuseums relied on the financial support and passion of younger generations and hence were vulnerable.
机译：1970年代在法国兴起的Ecomusée是一种露天博物馆，旨在将收藏品保留在其原始环境中，并由当地社区作为策展人并管理自己的遗产。这种方法和哲学在保护和解释过程中暗含并依赖民主原则。自1990年代以来，中国采用生态博物馆的概念来保​​护选定的民族村庄，以缓解贫困与遗产保护之间的紧张关系。但是，这个概念在中国真的有用吗？为了回答这个问题，第一个这样的倡议Suojia Ecomuseum被选为案例研究，并使用现场观察，文献记录和半结构化访谈的混合方法进行了评估。此过程已经确定了与此电子博物馆相关的几个问题。这表明索嘉博物馆尚未达到国际标准，也没有达到哲学上的或实际的期望。这个结论挑战了国际公认的观点，即所有电子博物馆都是以自下而上的方式发展和运作的，它们都是基于社区和民主的。这些差异引发了关于中国和其他地方的电子博物馆之间差异的其他问题。为了绘制地图并比较中国和西方民主国家的电子图书馆之间的差异，澳大利亚墨尔本西部生活博物馆进行了详细调查。采用与中国相同的方法，对其背景，目标，管理结构，计划和活动以及项目成果和问题进行了可比性审查。然后说明并展示了索嘉博物馆与墨尔本生活博物馆之间的区别。他们展示了相当多样化的组织，它们针对不同的文化和自然资源具有不同的目标和管理结构。但是，出乎意料的发现是，这两个博物馆的未来都依赖年轻一代的资金支持和热情，因此很脆弱。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yi, Sabrina Hong;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号